God exists as three persons
– Father, Son, and Holy Spirit –
and each is fully God, and there is one God.
What is Lent?
40 days
reflection
desert time
anticipating the Cross
A series in 6 parts of the Christian life, sharing in:
worship
prayer
scripture
communion
service
good news
Jesus you are the way, guide us on our journey.
1 One day Jesus was praying in a certain place. When he finished, one of his disciples said to him, “Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples.”
[Contrary to Richter] Longman finds Christians increasingly attracted to OT.
'spell-binding plots', 'vivid characters'
Paul says [1 Cor 10:1-11] that these are warnings against behaviour such as Solomon’s who lost a kingdom as a result of his marriages to foreign wives [1 Kings].
Most people have a hodge-podge of knowledge of the old testament but no coherent structure. Richter suggests there are three reasons for this:
Never been taught the OT is their story. Both story and God different to the NT and to Jesus, even unnecessary.
OT is inaccessible for historical, geographical, cultural, linguistic etc. reasons.
The 'dysfunctional closet syndrome'.
OT is two thirds of the Bible and redemption story but treated as 'unfortunate preface'. Yet the characters are unknown to us as close relatives may be to an Alzheimer’s sufferer.
Who are you following?
There are no free thinkers
The world is forming us continuously …into what?
Even on days of doubt, I want to believe. I resonate with Peter’s conclusion
Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.
Dramatisation of Peter’s calling by Jesus. Conclusion: bizarre, what on earth made him do that?
Rabbi as guru, each with a yoke (Hebrew idiom for briefs and practices).
Who are you following?
There are no free thinkers
The world is forming us continuously …into what?
Even on days of doubt, I want to believe. I resonate with Peter’s conclusion
Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.
Dramatisation of Peter’s calling by Jesus. Conclusion: bizarre, what on earth made him do that?
Rabbi as guru, each with a yoke (Hebrew idiom for briefs and practices).
Although a great deal of the best work in bioethics has involved the application of certain ethical principles — such as respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice — to particular issues of concern, there is no way to apply principles in a vacuum. How we understand such principles, and how we understand the situations we encounter, will depend on background beliefs that we bring to moral reflection — beliefs about the meaning of human life, the significance of suffering and dying, and the ultimate context in which to understand our being and doing. Our views on such matters are shaped by reasoned argument and reflection less often than we like to imagine. Our background beliefs are commonly held at a kind of prearticulate level. We take them in with the air we breathe, drink them in from the surrounding culture. It is, therefore, useful sometimes to call to mind simply and straightforwardly certain basic elements in a Christian vision of the world — to remind ourselves of how contrary to the assumptions of our culture that vision may be. Hence, before we turn in the following chapters to complicated issues in bioethics, we do well to reflect briefly upon some of our background beliefs.
Although a great deal of the best work in bioethics has involved the application of certain ethical principles — such as respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice — to particular issues of concern, there is no way to apply principles in a vacuum. How we understand such principles, and how we understand the situations we encounter, will depend on background beliefs that we bring to moral reflection — beliefs about the meaning of human life, the significance of suffering and dying, and the ultimate context in which to understand our being and doing. Our views on such matters are shaped by reasoned argument and reflection less often than we like to imagine. Our background beliefs are commonly held at a kind of prearticulate level. We take them in with the air we breathe, drink them in from the surrounding culture. It is, therefore, useful sometimes to call to mind simply and straightforwardly certain basic elements in a Christian vision of the world — to remind ourselves of how contrary to the assumptions of our culture that vision may be. Hence, before we turn in the following chapters to complicated issues in bioethics, we do well to reflect briefly upon some of our background beliefs.
Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."
[Contrary to Richter] Longman finds Christians increasingly attracted to OT.
'spell-binding plots', 'vivid characters'
Paul says [1 Cor 10:1-11] that these are warnings against behaviour such as Solomon’s who lost a kingdom as a result of his marriages to foreign wives [1 Kings].
Most people have a hodge-podge of knowledge of the old testament but no coherent structure. Richter suggests there are three reasons for this:
Never been taught the OT is their story. Both story and God different to the NT and to Jesus, even unnecessary.
OT is inaccessible for historical, geographical, cultural, linguistic etc. reasons.
The 'dysfunctional closet syndrome'.
OT is two thirds of the Bible and redemption story but treated as 'unfortunate preface'. Yet the characters are unknown to us as close relatives may be to an Alzheimer’s sufferer.
The French Revolution (1789)
An up-ending of tthe status quo that had been in place since medieval times.
By contrast, Britain had already had its revolution.
Church and status quo had been very closely linked thus Revolution almost destroyed the church (and it was illegal for a time)
Initiated on the back of growing disparity between rich and poor and by Descartes, then Voltaire, Russeau whose rational humanism was able to undermine the status quo
Within the revolution a period when no one was in charge and everything was violently turned on its head
In Britain, church and aristocracy very threatened and caused them to challenge the rational, enlightenment under-pinnings of revolution.
The Hanoverian Church of England, despite its redeeming qualities, stood sorely in need of reform. The age of reason had forgotten certain fundamental human needs; natural religion might satisfy the minds of some, but the hearts of multitudes were hungry. The weaknesses of the established church - its failure to provide adequate care, the inflexibility of its parish system, its neglect of the new towns — left a vast and needy population waiting to be touched by a new word of power. ‘Just at this time, when we wanted little of “filling up the measure of our iniquities”, two or three clergymen of the Church of England began vehemently to “call sinners to repentance”’. In two or three years they had sounded the alarm to the utmost borders of the land. Many thousands gathered to hear them; and in every place where they came, many began to show such a concern for religion as they never had done before,’ This is Wesley’s own account of the beginnings of the Methodist revival.
Wycliffe and the Lollards (see last week)
Humanism’s influence on scholarship: not just reformers – eg. Thomas More (1478-1532)
Henry VIII (1491–1547), King of England from 1509–1547.
Married Katherine of Aragon (daughter of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella) in 1509. K had been married to Henry’s older brother, Arthur, who had died in 1502.
Henry wasn’t a natural ‘reformer’ – tended to be very conservative about belief and practice: wrote Assertio Septem Sacramentorum (asserting there are seven sacraments) against Luther in 1521. Pope bestowed on him the title Defender of the Faith (Fides Defensor) in thanks.
In Zurich the Reformation came in the way normal among the free cities of the Holy Roman Empire. The leading citizens were influenced by the reforming doctrines; they resisted and repudiated the authority of the Bishop of Constance when he tried to interfere; the city council legislated to reform the churches and parishes, with the advice of its chief pastors, to allow clerical marriage, to remove superstitious images and relics, to suppress. the monasteries and use their endowments for education, and to order a vernacular and simplified liturgy instead of the mass, The process began in 1522 and was complete by 1525, As in other cities, the council followed with reforming regulations to control public morals,
Tue name of Counter-Reformation suggests a fight against Protestantism; There was a political aspect of the CounterReformation, a league of Catholic powers ready to crusade against the new Protestant states. There was also a true sense in which the fight against Protestantism encouraged the reforming movement within the Roman Catholic Church. But it did not create it. The conflict with Protestantism gave to reform a new edge, to cut through the vested interests and administrative conservatism which 2 frustrated reform. It gave to reform a dynamic, a vitality, an affection for ancient ways, and a mistrust of Protestant ways,
Christians were first Jews so necessary to find continuity from Old Testament and old covenant
P9, 10 Jews 'a race apart' but 'ready to dedicate synagogues "to God in honour of the emperor"'
'A million Jews in Alexandria and Egypt' → influential. Often easier to let them have their own way in matters of religion
Admired for monotheism, morality and antiquity
Septuagint (work of 70 authors) dated from Alexandria in 3rd C BC under sponsorships of Ptolemy Philadelphus
The Gnostic heretics had appealed to the principles of Platonism to provide a philosophical justification for their doctrine that the elect soul must be liberated from the evil inherent in the material realm to escape to its true home and to enjoy the beatific vision. Their deep pessimism about this created order was not quite fairly deduced from the text of Plato, but there was a sufficient plausibility about the argument to make it look impressive. The Gnostic appeal to pagan philosophy did not tend to encourage the study of philosophy among those who feared Gnosticism as a corrupter of the truth. Philosophy came to seem like the mother of heresy. To Irenaeus of Lyons Gnosticism was a ragbag of heathen speculations with bits taken from different philosophers to dress out a bogus, anti-rational mythology. His successor as an anti-heretical writer, Hippolytus, whose mind was a curious mixture of scholarship and foolishness, wrote a lengthy refutation of the sects based on the presupposition that each sect had corrupted the authentic gospel by principles drawn from a pagan philosopher; he incidentally preserved thereby many fragments of classical philosophers like Heraclitus which would otherwise have been lost. Tertullian scornfully mocked those who 'advocate a Stoic or a Platonic or an Aristotelian Christianity'. It was a Gnostic thesis that faith needs supplementation by philosophical inquiries. 'What has Athens in common with Jerusalem?'
Theft receives certain punishment by your law (Exodus 20:15) Lord and by the law written in the hearts of men (Rom 2:14) which not even iniquity itself destroys … I wanted to carry out an act of theft and did so, driven by no kind of need other than my inner lack of any sense of or feeling for, justice. Wickedness filled me. I stole something which I had in plenty and of much better quality. My desire was to enjoy not what I sought by stealing but merely the excitement of thieving and the doing of what was wrong. There was a pear tree near our vineyard laden with fruit, though attractive neither in colour nor taste. To shake the fruit off the tree and carry off the pears, I and a gang of naughty adolescents set off late at night after (in our usual pestilential way) we had continued our game in the streets. We carried off a huge load of pears. But they were not for our feasts but merely to throw to the pigs. Even if we ate a few, nevertheless our pleasure lay in doing what was not allowed. Such was my heart, O God, such was my heart. You had pity on it when it was at the bottom of the abyss. Now let my heart tell you what it was seeking there in that I became evil for no reason. I had no motive for my wickedness except wickedness itself. It was foul and I loved it. I loved the self-destruction, I loved my fall, not the object for which I had fallen but my fall itself. My depraved soul leaped down from your firmament to ruin. I was seeking not to gain any thing by shameful means but shame for its own sake.
Theft receives certain punishment by your law (Exodus 20:15) Lord and by the law written in the hearts of men (Rom 2:14) which not even iniquity itself destroys … I wanted to carry out an act of theft and did so, driven by no kind of need other than my inner lack of any sense of or feeling for, justice. Wickedness filled me. I stole something which I had in plenty and of much better quality. My desire was to enjoy not what I sought by stealing but merely the excitement of thieving and the doing of what was wrong. There was a pear tree near our vineyard laden with fruit, though attractive neither in colour nor taste. To shake the fruit off the tree and carry off the pears, I and a gang of naughty adolescents set off late at night after (in our usual pestilential way) we had continued our game in the streets. We carried off a huge load of pears. But they were not for our feasts but merely to throw to the pigs. Even if we ate a few, nevertheless our pleasure lay in doing what was not allowed. Such was my heart, O God, such was my heart. You had pity on it when it was at the bottom of the abyss. Now let my heart tell you what it was seeking there in that I became evil for no reason. I had no motive for my wickedness except wickedness itself. It was foul and I loved it. I loved the self-destruction, I loved my fall, not the object for which I had fallen but my fall itself. My depraved soul leaped down from your firmament to ruin. I was seeking not to gain any thing by shameful means but shame for its own sake.
Much of Britain’s self-understanding comes from centuries of Christian faith, but many in Britain now have minimal knpowledge of the Christian faith. Mission shaped church start of post-Christendom section
drop from 55 to 4% Sunday school atendence in 20th century.
multi-culturalism reinforces consumerism in faith—whatever 'works' for you.
citation 59 no dormant faith to revive, second of third generation pagans.
a 'diametrically different' approach emerging from 'come' to 'go'
Much of Britain’s self-understanding comes from centuries of Christian faith, but many in Britain now have minimal knpowledge of the Christian faith. Mission shaped church start of post-Christendom section
drop from 55 to 4% Sunday school atendence in 20th century.
multi-culturalism reinforces consumerism in faith—whatever 'works' for you.
citation 59 no dormant faith to revive, second of third generation pagans.
a 'diametrically different' approach emerging from 'come' to 'go'
Much of Britain’s self-understanding comes from centuries of Christian faith, but many in Britain now have minimal knpowledge of the Christian faith. Mission shaped church start of post-Christendom section
drop from 55 to 4% Sunday school atendence in 20th century.
multi-culturalism reinforces consumerism in faith—whatever 'works' for you.
citation 59 no dormant faith to revive, second of third generation pagans.
a 'diametrically different' approach emerging from 'come' to 'go'
Much of Britain’s self-understanding comes from centuries of Christian faith, but many in Britain now have minimal knpowledge of the Christian faith. Mission shaped church start of post-Christendom section
drop from 55 to 4% Sunday school atendence in 20th century.
multi-culturalism reinforces consumerism in faith—whatever 'works' for you.
citation 59 no dormant faith to revive, second of third generation pagans.
a 'diametrically different' approach emerging from 'come' to 'go'
Theology concerns itself with God and all things in relation to God.
Questions
What is creation?
How is creation?
Why is creation?
Who creates?
An article of faith, not an empirical observation
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth…
‘…the doctrine of creation no less than the remaining content of Christian confession is an article of faith, i.e., the rendering of a knowledge which no man has procured for himself or ever will; which is neither native to him nor accessible by way of observation and logical thinking; for which he has no organ and no ability; which he can in fact achieve only in faith; but which is actually consummated in faith, i.e., in the reception of and response to the divine witness…’ --(Karl Barth, CD III/1, 3-4)
God exists as three persons
– Father, Son, and Holy Spirit –
and each is fully God, and there is one God.
Would it matter if God wasn’t triune?
'The treatise on the Trinity occupies a rather isolated position in the total dogmatic system. To put it crassly, and not without exaggeration, when the treatise is concluded, its subject is never brought up again. Its function in the whole dogmatic construction is not clearly perceived. It is as though this mystery has been revealed for its own sake, and that even after it has been made known to us, it remains, as a reality, locked up within itself. We make statements about it, but as a reality it has nothing to do with us at all.'
Theology is rational reflection on the person, nature, and works of God which is guided by the witness of scripture, informed by tradition, and in conversation with culture.
Primarily systematic
diverse views
over time and
over place
66 books + ?
inspired/revealed word of God, written by people
a guide
a gift
points to God, not to itself
Before we think specifically about mission history, it’s important to get our bearings: why is history important? How do we interpret it, so that it speaks to us today? All Christians should have a strong sense of history since their identity has been forged out of historical events, even if those events, for Anglicans for example, were often politically very ambiguous and even embarrassing. But that is just as true of all history, and no less true of the history which shaped the people of God in Scripture! That was also sometimes very ambiguous and embarrassing. Biblical faith is itself a historical faith, and God reveals himself through its story. As we interpret the past we try to understand what God has been doing in history and therefore how he is at work today. If we believe that the Lord of history was in providential control of past events to fulfil his missio Dei mission purposes, so we trust that 'God is working His purpose out' today, even through the tortuous complexity of human affairs.
Before we think specifically about mission history, it’s important to get our bearings: why is history important? How do we interpret it, so that it speaks to us today? All Christians should have a strong sense of history since their identity has been forged out of historical events, even if those events, for Anglicans for example, were often politically very ambiguous and even embarrassing. But that is just as true of all history, and no less true of the history which shaped the people of God in Scripture! That was also sometimes very ambiguous and embarrassing. Biblical faith is itself a historical faith, and God reveals himself through its story. As we interpret the past we try to understand what God has been doing in history and therefore how he is at work today. If we believe that the Lord of history was in providential control of past events to fulfil his missio Dei mission purposes, so we trust that 'God is working His purpose out' today, even through the tortuous complexity of human affairs.
Before we think specifically about mission history, it’s important to get our bearings: why is history important? How do we interpret it, so that it speaks to us today? All Christians should have a strong sense of history since their identity has been forged out of historical events, even if those events, for Anglicans for example, were often politically very ambiguous and even embarrassing. But that is just as true of all history, and no less true of the history which shaped the people of God in Scripture! That was also sometimes very ambiguous and embarrassing. Biblical faith is itself a historical faith, and God reveals himself through its story. As we interpret the past we try to understand what God has been doing in history and therefore how he is at work today. If we believe that the Lord of history was in providential control of past events to fulfil his missio Dei mission purposes, so we trust that 'God is working His purpose out' today, even through the tortuous complexity of human affairs.
Before we think specifically about mission history, it’s important to get our bearings: why is history important? How do we interpret it, so that it speaks to us today? All Christians should have a strong sense of history since their identity has been forged out of historical events, even if those events, for Anglicans for example, were often politically very ambiguous and even embarrassing. But that is just as true of all history, and no less true of the history which shaped the people of God in Scripture! That was also sometimes very ambiguous and embarrassing. Biblical faith is itself a historical faith, and God reveals himself through its story. As we interpret the past we try to understand what God has been doing in history and therefore how he is at work today. If we believe that the Lord of history was in providential control of past events to fulfil his missio Dei mission purposes, so we trust that 'God is working His purpose out' today, even through the tortuous complexity of human affairs.
[Contrary to Richter] Longman finds Christians increasingly attracted to OT.
'spell-binding plots', 'vivid characters'
Paul says [1 Cor 10:1-11] that these are warnings against behaviour such as Solomon’s who lost a kingdom as a result of his marriages to foreign wives [1 Kings].
Most people have a hodge-podge of knowledge of the old testament but no coherent structure. Richter suggests there are three reasons for this:
Never been taught the OT is their story. Both story and God different to the NT and to Jesus, even unnecessary.
OT is inaccessible for historical, geographical, cultural, linguistic etc. reasons.
The 'dysfunctional closet syndrome'.
OT is two thirds of the Bible and redemption story but treated as 'unfortunate preface'. Yet the characters are unknown to us as close relatives may be to an Alzheimer’s sufferer.
[Contrary to Richter] Longman finds Christians increasingly attracted to OT.
'spell-binding plots', 'vivid characters'
Paul says [1 Cor 10:1-11] that these are warnings against behaviour such as Solomon’s who lost a kingdom as a result of his marriages to foreign wives [1 Kings].
Most people have a hodge-podge of knowledge of the old testament but no coherent structure. Richter suggests there are three reasons for this:
Never been taught the OT is their story. Both story and God different to the NT and to Jesus, even unnecessary.
OT is inaccessible for historical, geographical, cultural, linguistic etc. reasons.
The 'dysfunctional closet syndrome'.
OT is two thirds of the Bible and redemption story but treated as 'unfortunate preface'. Yet the characters are unknown to us as close relatives may be to an Alzheimer’s sufferer.
Theology concerns itself with God and all things in relation to God.
Questions
What is creation?
How is creation?
Why is creation?
Who creates?
An article of faith, not an empirical observation
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth…
‘…the doctrine of creation no less than the remaining content of Christian confession is an article of faith, i.e., the rendering of a knowledge which no man has procured for himself or ever will; which is neither native to him nor accessible by way of observation and logical thinking; for which he has no organ and no ability; which he can in fact achieve only in faith; but which is actually consummated in faith, i.e., in the reception of and response to the divine witness…’ --(Karl Barth, CD III/1, 3-4)
God exists as three persons
– Father, Son, and Holy Spirit –
and each is fully God, and there is one God.
Would it matter if God wasn’t triune?
'The treatise on the Trinity occupies a rather isolated position in the total dogmatic system. To put it crassly, and not without exaggeration, when the treatise is concluded, its subject is never brought up again. Its function in the whole dogmatic construction is not clearly perceived. It is as though this mystery has been revealed for its own sake, and that even after it has been made known to us, it remains, as a reality, locked up within itself. We make statements about it, but as a reality it has nothing to do with us at all.'
To compare and contrast classical and modern intuitions about the being of God.
To become aware of the unique relationship between God and human language.
To gain a basic familiarity with certain issues surrounding talk of divine ‘attributes.’
To instil an impulse of humility and prayer when attempting to speak about God.
Theology is rational reflection on the person, nature, and works of God which is guided by the witness of scripture, informed by tradition, and in conversation with culture.
Primarily systematic
diverse views
over time and
over place
66 books + ?
inspired/revealed word of God, written by people
a guide
a gift
points to God, not to itself
Theology concerns itself with God and all things in relation to God.
Questions
What is creation?
How is creation?
Why is creation?
Who creates?
An article of faith, not an empirical observation
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth…
‘…the doctrine of creation no less than the remaining content of Christian confession is an article of faith, i.e., the rendering of a knowledge which no man has procured for himself or ever will; which is neither native to him nor accessible by way of observation and logical thinking; for which he has no organ and no ability; which he can in fact achieve only in faith; but which is actually consummated in faith, i.e., in the reception of and response to the divine witness…’ --(Karl Barth, CD III/1, 3-4)
If Christians know anything about the Old Testament, they know the first few lines in which God is said to have cteated heaven and earth, Following the carly ecumenical creeds in which Gods creation of the world is cited first among the acts of salvation history, Christians often express such a belief in the routine course of worship—for example, in the thanksgiving portions of eucharistic services or when renewing baptismal vows.
If Christians know anything about the Old Testament, they know the first few lines in which God is said to have cteated heaven and earth, Following the carly ecumenical creeds in which Gods creation of the world is cited first among the acts of salvation history, Christians often express such a belief in the routine course of worship—for example, in the thanksgiving portions of eucharistic services or when renewing baptismal vows.
If Christians know anything about the Old Testament, they know the first few lines in which God is said to have cteated heaven and earth, Following the carly ecumenical creeds in which Gods creation of the world is cited first among the acts of salvation history, Christians often express such a belief in the routine course of worship—for example, in the thanksgiving portions of eucharistic services or when renewing baptismal vows.
God exists as three persons
– Father, Son, and Holy Spirit –
and each is fully God, and there is one God.
Would it matter if God wasn’t triune?
'The treatise on the Trinity occupies a rather isolated position in the total dogmatic system. To put it crassly, and not without exaggeration, when the treatise is concluded, its subject is never brought up again. Its function in the whole dogmatic construction is not clearly perceived. It is as though this mystery has been revealed for its own sake, and that even after it has been made known to us, it remains, as a reality, locked up within itself. We make statements about it, but as a reality it has nothing to do with us at all.'
Gregory of Nazianzus (c.329-c.390) was a fourth century theologian who, along with the other so-called 'Cappadocian Fathers' (Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa) played a large part in the theological settlement represented in the Council of Constantinople in 381 (which produced the final form of the Nicene Creed). In the years leading up to the Council, Gregory preached what have become known as the the five 'Theological Orations' in defence of the divinity of the Son, and chiefly against a group of heretics known as the Eunomians. The first oration is notable for its development of the following themes: 1. The portrayal of heretics as those who indulge in theological debate merely for 'sport' or amusement. 2. The purity of one’s heart as a prerequisite for doing theology. 3. The need for 'restraining one’s tongue' when it comes to speaking of the divine mysteries. 4. The belief that theology should be protected from becoming too 'common.' 5. The insistence that the agenda for theology should be set by its own subject matter (i.e., God) rather than by debates with opponents. 6. The plea for those interested in simply debating to focus on any subject other than God—since talking about God must always be, in a certain sense, 'dangerous.'
Gregory of Nazianzus (c.329-c.390) was a fourth century theologian who, along with the other so-called 'Cappadocian Fathers' (Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa) played a large part in the theological settlement represented in the Council of Constantinople in 381 (which produced the final form of the Nicene Creed). In the years leading up to the Council, Gregory preached what have become known as the the five 'Theological Orations' in defence of the divinity of the Son, and chiefly against a group of heretics known as the Eunomians. The first oration is notable for its development of the following themes: 1. The portrayal of heretics as those who indulge in theological debate merely for 'sport' or amusement. 2. The purity of one’s heart as a prerequisite for doing theology. 3. The need for 'restraining one’s tongue' when it comes to speaking of the divine mysteries. 4. The belief that theology should be protected from becoming too 'common.' 5. The insistence that the agenda for theology should be set by its own subject matter (i.e., God) rather than by debates with opponents. 6. The plea for those interested in simply debating to focus on any subject other than God—since talking about God must always be, in a certain sense, 'dangerous.'
The Gnostic heretics had appealed to the principles of Platonism to provide a philosophical justification for their doctrine that the elect soul must be liberated from the evil inherent in the material realm to escape to its true home and to enjoy the beatific vision. Their deep pessimism about this created order was not quite fairly deduced from the text of Plato, but there was a sufficient plausibility about the argument to make it look impressive. The Gnostic appeal to pagan philosophy did not tend to encourage the study of philosophy among those who feared Gnosticism as a corrupter of the truth. Philosophy came to seem like the mother of heresy. To Irenaeus of Lyons Gnosticism was a ragbag of heathen speculations with bits taken from different philosophers to dress out a bogus, anti-rational mythology. His successor as an anti-heretical writer, Hippolytus, whose mind was a curious mixture of scholarship and foolishness, wrote a lengthy refutation of the sects based on the presupposition that each sect had corrupted the authentic gospel by principles drawn from a pagan philosopher; he incidentally preserved thereby many fragments of classical philosophers like Heraclitus which would otherwise have been lost. Tertullian scornfully mocked those who 'advocate a Stoic or a Platonic or an Aristotelian Christianity'. It was a Gnostic thesis that faith needs supplementation by philosophical inquiries. 'What has Athens in common with Jerusalem?'
To compare and contrast classical and modern intuitions about the being of God.
To become aware of the unique relationship between God and human language.
To gain a basic familiarity with certain issues surrounding talk of divine ‘attributes.’
To instil an impulse of humility and prayer when attempting to speak about God.
Theology is rational reflection on the person, nature, and works of God which is guided by the witness of scripture, informed by tradition, and in conversation with culture.
Primarily systematic
diverse views
over time and
over place
66 books + ?
inspired/revealed word of God, written by people
a guide
a gift
points to God, not to itself
The Hanoverian Church of England, despite its redeeming qualities, stood sorely in need of reform. The age of reason had forgotten certain fundamental human needs; natural religion might satisfy the minds of some, but the hearts of multitudes were hungry. The weaknesses of the established church - its failure to provide adequate care, the inflexibility of its parish system, its neglect of the new towns — left a vast and needy population waiting to be touched by a new word of power. ‘Just at this time, when we wanted little of “filling up the measure of our iniquities”, two or three clergymen of the Church of England began vehemently to “call sinners to repentance”’. In two or three years they had sounded the alarm to the utmost borders of the land. Many thousands gathered to hear them; and in every place where they came, many began to show such a concern for religion as they never had done before,’ This is Wesley’s own account of the beginnings of the Methodist revival.
The Hanoverian Church of England, despite its redeeming qualities, stood sorely in need of reform. The age of reason had forgotten certain fundamental human needs; natural religion might satisfy the minds of some, but the hearts of multitudes were hungry. The weaknesses of the established church - its failure to provide adequate care, the inflexibility of its parish system, its neglect of the new towns — left a vast and needy population waiting to be touched by a new word of power. ‘Just at this time, when we wanted little of “filling up the measure of our iniquities”, two or three clergymen of the Church of England began vehemently to “call sinners to repentance”’. In two or three years they had sounded the alarm to the utmost borders of the land. Many thousands gathered to hear them; and in every place where they came, many began to show such a concern for religion as they never had done before,’ This is Wesley’s own account of the beginnings of the Methodist revival.
The Hanoverian Church of England, despite its redeeming qualities, stood sorely in need of reform. The age of reason had forgotten certain fundamental human needs; natural religion might satisfy the minds of some, but the hearts of multitudes were hungry. The weaknesses of the established church - its failure to provide adequate care, the inflexibility of its parish system, its neglect of the new towns — left a vast and needy population waiting to be touched by a new word of power. ‘Just at this time, when we wanted little of “filling up the measure of our iniquities”, two or three clergymen of the Church of England began vehemently to “call sinners to repentance”’. In two or three years they had sounded the alarm to the utmost borders of the land. Many thousands gathered to hear them; and in every place where they came, many began to show such a concern for religion as they never had done before,’ This is Wesley’s own account of the beginnings of the Methodist revival.
The Hanoverian Church of England, despite its redeeming qualities, stood sorely in need of reform. The age of reason had forgotten certain fundamental human needs; natural religion might satisfy the minds of some, but the hearts of multitudes were hungry. The weaknesses of the established church - its failure to provide adequate care, the inflexibility of its parish system, its neglect of the new towns — left a vast and needy population waiting to be touched by a new word of power. ‘Just at this time, when we wanted little of “filling up the measure of our iniquities”, two or three clergymen of the Church of England began vehemently to “call sinners to repentance”’. In two or three years they had sounded the alarm to the utmost borders of the land. Many thousands gathered to hear them; and in every place where they came, many began to show such a concern for religion as they never had done before,’ This is Wesley’s own account of the beginnings of the Methodist revival.
The Gnostic heretics had appealed to the principles of Platonism to provide a philosophical justification for their doctrine that the elect soul must be liberated from the evil inherent in the material realm to escape to its true home and to enjoy the beatific vision. Their deep pessimism about this created order was not quite fairly deduced from the text of Plato, but there was a sufficient plausibility about the argument to make it look impressive. The Gnostic appeal to pagan philosophy did not tend to encourage the study of philosophy among those who feared Gnosticism as a corrupter of the truth. Philosophy came to seem like the mother of heresy. To Irenaeus of Lyons Gnosticism was a ragbag of heathen speculations with bits taken from different philosophers to dress out a bogus, anti-rational mythology. His successor as an anti-heretical writer, Hippolytus, whose mind was a curious mixture of scholarship and foolishness, wrote a lengthy refutation of the sects based on the presupposition that each sect had corrupted the authentic gospel by principles drawn from a pagan philosopher; he incidentally preserved thereby many fragments of classical philosophers like Heraclitus which would otherwise have been lost. Tertullian scornfully mocked those who 'advocate a Stoic or a Platonic or an Aristotelian Christianity'. It was a Gnostic thesis that faith needs supplementation by philosophical inquiries. 'What has Athens in common with Jerusalem?'
The Gnostic heretics had appealed to the principles of Platonism to provide a philosophical justification for their doctrine that the elect soul must be liberated from the evil inherent in the material realm to escape to its true home and to enjoy the beatific vision. Their deep pessimism about this created order was not quite fairly deduced from the text of Plato, but there was a sufficient plausibility about the argument to make it look impressive. The Gnostic appeal to pagan philosophy did not tend to encourage the study of philosophy among those who feared Gnosticism as a corrupter of the truth. Philosophy came to seem like the mother of heresy. To Irenaeus of Lyons Gnosticism was a ragbag of heathen speculations with bits taken from different philosophers to dress out a bogus, anti-rational mythology. His successor as an anti-heretical writer, Hippolytus, whose mind was a curious mixture of scholarship and foolishness, wrote a lengthy refutation of the sects based on the presupposition that each sect had corrupted the authentic gospel by principles drawn from a pagan philosopher; he incidentally preserved thereby many fragments of classical philosophers like Heraclitus which would otherwise have been lost. Tertullian scornfully mocked those who 'advocate a Stoic or a Platonic or an Aristotelian Christianity'. It was a Gnostic thesis that faith needs supplementation by philosophical inquiries. 'What has Athens in common with Jerusalem?'
The Gnostic heretics had appealed to the principles of Platonism to provide a philosophical justification for their doctrine that the elect soul must be liberated from the evil inherent in the material realm to escape to its true home and to enjoy the beatific vision. Their deep pessimism about this created order was not quite fairly deduced from the text of Plato, but there was a sufficient plausibility about the argument to make it look impressive. The Gnostic appeal to pagan philosophy did not tend to encourage the study of philosophy among those who feared Gnosticism as a corrupter of the truth. Philosophy came to seem like the mother of heresy. To Irenaeus of Lyons Gnosticism was a ragbag of heathen speculations with bits taken from different philosophers to dress out a bogus, anti-rational mythology. His successor as an anti-heretical writer, Hippolytus, whose mind was a curious mixture of scholarship and foolishness, wrote a lengthy refutation of the sects based on the presupposition that each sect had corrupted the authentic gospel by principles drawn from a pagan philosopher; he incidentally preserved thereby many fragments of classical philosophers like Heraclitus which would otherwise have been lost. Tertullian scornfully mocked those who 'advocate a Stoic or a Platonic or an Aristotelian Christianity'. It was a Gnostic thesis that faith needs supplementation by philosophical inquiries. 'What has Athens in common with Jerusalem?'